A child born in Sierra Leone can expect to complete just 8.9 years of school (or 4.5 years when adjusted for learning) by the time they turn 18, out of a total of 12 years of formal education expected by this age. The 2014 Early Grade Reading Assessment (EGRA) found that 87% of Grade 2 students were unable to read a single word, and that 97% received zero marks on the reading and comprehension assessment. By Primary 4, 60% of children still scored zero on the same reading comprehension test. Girls face more challenges than boys with regards to education due to teenage pregnancy (the ban for pregnant girls participating in education was lifted only in April 2020), early forced marriages, school related Gender-Based Violence (GBV), and poor in-school sanitation facilities. As such, the Government has prioritized girls education as part of their policy agenda.
Description of the intervention
5 service providers will be chosen to implement 5 distinct interventions across 5 geographical lots. Specific interventions TBD.
Target population
Children enrolled in P1 to P6 across public schools in Sierra Leone, with special focus on girls (outcomes priced 20% higher than those of boys)
Location
Country:
Sierra Leone
Locality:
Sierra Leone
Outcome metrics
(1) Learning gains in literacy and numeracy (95% of payments)
(2) Percentage of children meeting grade appropriate minimum competencies in literacy and numeracy (5% of payments)
Last data update
Data for this pipeline project was last updated in March 2024
You might have noticed that some pipeline projects have more data than others. This is because organisations can share as much data as they want with the INDIGO initiative. If you have more data on one of these pipeline projects and would like to share with us, please get in touch at indigo@bsg.ox.ac.uk. Our full list of variables and data definitions can be found here.
INDIGO data are shared for research and policy analysis purposes. INDIGO data can be used to support a range of insights, for example, to understand the social outcomes that projects aim to improve, the network of organisations across projects, trends, scales, timelines and summary information. The collaborative system by which we collect, process, and share data is designed to advance data-sharing norms, harmonise data definitions and improve data use. These data are NOT shared for auditing, investment, or legal purposes. Please independently verify any data that you might use in decision making. We provide no guarantees or assurances as to the quality of these data. Data may be inaccurate, incomplete, inconsistent, and/or not current for various reasons: INDIGO is a collaborative and iterative initiative that mostly relies on projects all over the world volunteering to share their data. We have a system for processing information and try to attribute data to named sources, but we do not audit, cross-check, or verify all information provided to us. It takes time and resources to share data, which may not have been included in a project’s budget. Many of the projects are ongoing and timely updates may not be available. Different people may have different interpretations of data items and definitions. Even when data are high quality, interpretation or generalisation to different contexts may not be possible and/or requires additional information and/or expertise. Help us improve our data quality: email us at indigo@bsg.ox.ac.uk if you have data on new projects, changes or performance updates on current projects, clarifications or corrections on our data, and/or confidentiality or sensitivity notices. Please also give input via the INDIGO Data Definitions Improvement Tool and INDIGO Feedback Questionnaire.